The Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears match player stats reveal how an exciting NFL playoff game ended with Los Angeles defeating Chicago 20–17 in overtime on January 18, 2026, at Soldier Field. The NFC Divisional Round matchup featured strong rushing performances, important passing touchdowns, defensive turnovers, and a dramatic finish.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Matthew Stafford led the Rams’ passing attack with 258 passing yards, while running back Kyren Williams scored two rushing touchdowns. For Chicago, quarterback Caleb Williams threw for 257 yards and two touchdowns, but three interceptions proved costly. Bears running back D’Andre Swift also contributed 76 rushing yards, helping Chicago remain competitive throughout the contest.
Pro Football Reference
+1
This game was a close contest despite the difference in turnovers. Chicago recorded more total net yards than Los Angeles, but the Rams made the decisive play in overtime. The player statistics below cover passing, rushing, receiving, defensive contributions, team comparisons, and the performances that shaped the final result.
Quick Answer
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Chicago Bears 20–17 in overtime on January 18, 2026. Kyren Williams rushed for 87 yards and two touchdowns, Matthew Stafford passed for 258 yards, and Caleb Williams threw for 257 yards with two touchdowns and three interceptions. Harrison Mevis secured the win with a 42-yard field goal in overtime.
Pro Football Reference
+2
Why People Search for These Match Player Stats
Fans search for this matchup’s player statistics to understand more than the final score. Quarterback numbers show how each offense moved the ball, rushing statistics reveal which team controlled the ground game, and receiving figures identify the players who contributed most through the air.
The game is also notable because the Bears gained more total net yards but still lost. Comparing turnovers, touchdowns, and individual performances helps explain why yardage alone does not determine the winner.
2025 Divisional Round
+1
Los Angeles Rams Player Stats
The Rams combined a productive running game with enough passing production to win a close playoff contest. Kyren Williams was especially important because both of his rushing touchdowns helped Los Angeles build and restore its lead.
Rams Passing Stats
| Player | Completions/Attempts | Passing yards | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Stafford | 20/42 | 258 | 0 | 0 |
Stafford completed 20 of 42 passes and finished with 258 yards. Although he did not throw a touchdown, he avoided interceptions and helped the Rams move into scoring position. He was also sacked four times for a loss of 29 yards.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Rams Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyren Williams | 21 | 87 | 4.1 | 2 |
| Blake Corum | 6 | 19 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Puka Nacua | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
| J. Whittington | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Matthew Stafford | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
Kyren Williams led the Rams with 87 rushing yards and two touchdowns. He scored on a four-yard run in the first quarter and a five-yard run in the fourth quarter. Blake Corum added 19 yards on six carries.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Rams Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Receiving yards | Longest catch | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puka Nacua | 5 | 56 | 16 | 0 |
| Colby Parkinson | 3 | 56 | 35 | 0 |
| J. Whittington | 2 | 35 | 20 | 0 |
| Kyren Williams | 4 | 30 | 14 | 0 |
| Tyler Higbee | 1 | 27 | 27 | 0 |
| Davante Adams | 2 | 24 | 12 | 0 |
| Terrance Ferguson | 1 | 19 | 19 | 0 |
| K. Mumpfield | 2 | 11 | 6 | 0 |
Puka Nacua and Colby Parkinson shared the team lead in receiving yards, with 56 each. Parkinson’s longest reception covered 35 yards, while Nacua caught five passes on ten targets. Kyren Williams also helped the passing game with four receptions for 30 yards.
chicagobears.com
+1
Chicago Bears Player Stats
Chicago’s offense produced two passing touchdowns and several useful individual performances. However, the three interceptions thrown by Caleb Williams became a major factor in the Bears’ overtime loss.
Bears Passing Stats
| Player | Completions/Attempts | Passing yards | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | 23/42 | 257 | 2 | 3 |
Caleb Williams completed 23 of 42 passes for 257 yards. He threw touchdown passes to D.J. Moore and Cole Kmet, but three interceptions interrupted Chicago’s offensive drives. His passing performance combined productive scoring plays with costly mistakes.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Bears Rushing Stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D’Andre Swift | 19 | 76 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Caleb Williams | 5 | 40 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 13 | 36 | 2.8 | 0 |
| D.J. Moore | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Luther Burden III | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
D’Andre Swift led Chicago with 76 rushing yards on 19 carries. Caleb Williams added 40 yards on five carries, showing his ability to gain ground with his legs. Kyle Monangai contributed another 36 rushing yards.
chicagobears.com
+1
Bears Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Receiving yards | Longest catch | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colston Loveland | 4 | 56 | 23 | 0 |
| D.J. Moore | 5 | 52 | 34 | 1 |
| Rome Odunze | 2 | 44 | 27 | 0 |
| Kyle Monangai | 4 | 36 | 16 | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 3 | 31 | 14 | 1 |
| Luther Burden III | 3 | 24 | 11 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 |
| Cole? | — | — | — | — |
D.J. Moore caught five passes for 52 yards and a touchdown, while rookie tight end Colston Loveland recorded 56 yards on four catches. Cole Kmet also scored a receiving touchdown, tying the game at 17 late in the fourth quarter.
chicagobears.com
+1
Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears Comparison Table
The following table compares the teams’ final results and key offensive statistics.
| Statistic | Los Angeles Rams | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 20 | 17 |
| Total net yards | 340 | 417 |
| Passing yards | 258 | 257 |
| Rushing yards | 111 | 160 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 3 |
| Time of possession | 32:26 | 39:15 |
| Sacks allowed | 4 | 0 |
Source: official team box scores and game statistics.
chicagobears.com
+1
Chicago gained 77 more total net yards and held the ball for nearly seven minutes longer. Nevertheless, the Rams won because they scored two rushing touchdowns, protected the ball through the air, and converted the winning field goal in overtime.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Which Players Had the Biggest Impact?
Kyren Williams: The Rams’ Scoring Leader
Williams’ two rushing touchdowns were central to Los Angeles’ victory. His 87 rushing yards gave the Rams a reliable option on the ground, especially when they needed to regain the lead in the fourth quarter.
Caleb Williams: Productive but Turnover-Prone
Caleb Williams passed for 257 yards and two touchdowns, but his three interceptions limited Chicago’s chances. His 40 rushing yards added another dimension to the offense.
D.J. Moore: A Key Receiving Threat
Moore recorded five receptions for 52 yards and one touchdown. His score helped Chicago tie the game in the second quarter and kept the Bears in contention.
Harrison Mevis: The Decisive Kicker
Mevis made a 42-yard field goal in overtime with 3:19 remaining. That kick gave Los Angeles its 20–17 victory and ended Chicago’s playoff run.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Defensive Player Stats and Turnovers
Defense played an important role in this playoff matchup. The Rams recorded three interceptions, while the Bears generated four sacks. These contrasting performances show how one defense created turnovers while the other put pressure on the opposing quarterback.
Pro Football Reference
+1
| Defensive statistic | Los Angeles Rams | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Interceptions | 3 | 0 |
| Sacks | 0 | 4 |
| Total net yards allowed | 417 | 340 |
The Rams’ three interceptions were credited to Cobie Durant, who recorded two, and Kamren Curl, who recorded one. Chicago’s four sacks helped restrict Stafford’s passing efficiency, but the Bears could not turn their defensive pressure into a victory.
Pro Football Reference
+2
Common Mistakes When Reading NFL Player Stats
Understanding football statistics makes it easier to compare players accurately. Here are some common mistakes to avoid.
- Confusing passing yards with total yards: Passing yards count yards gained through completed passes, not a quarterback’s rushing yards.
- Ignoring interceptions: A quarterback can throw for many yards but still hurt his team with turnovers.
- Treating receptions and targets as the same: Targets are passes directed toward a receiver; receptions are passes successfully caught.
- Ignoring touchdowns by type: Rushing touchdowns and passing touchdowns are recorded separately.
- Assuming more total yards means a win: The Bears gained more net yards than the Rams but lost 20–17 in overtime.
Pro Football Reference+1
Memory Trick for Understanding Match Stats
Use this simple method to remember the most important football statistics:
- PASS — completions, attempts, passing yards, touchdowns and interceptions.
- RUSH — carries, rushing yards and rushing touchdowns.
- CATCH — receptions, receiving yards and receiving touchdowns.
- DEFENSE — sacks, interceptions and tackles.
- TEAM — final score, total yards and time of possession.
For this matchup, remember three key numbers: 87 rushing yards for Kyren Williams, 3 interceptions by Caleb Williams, and a 20–17 final score.
American vs British English: Football Terminology
American football uses terminology that may differ from everyday British English.
| Term | Meaning in American football |
|---|---|
| Yard | A unit of distance used to measure progress on the field |
| Touchdown | A scoring play worth six points before any extra-point attempt |
| Field goal | A successful kick through the goalposts, worth three points |
| Overtime | Extra playing time used to determine a winner when regulation ends tied |
| Interception | A defensive player catches a pass intended for the offense |
The terms above are standard in American football. British English speakers may be more familiar with association football, where words such as touchdown and field goal have different relevance.
Similar Match Statistics to Follow
Fans interested in the Rams–Bears matchup may also want to examine these related statistics:
- Quarterback comparison: Compare passing yards, completion percentage, touchdowns and interceptions.
- Running back performance: Review rushing attempts, yards per carry and rushing touchdowns.
- Wide receiver production: Compare receptions, receiving yards and yards after the catch.
- Defensive performance: Track sacks, interceptions, tackles and forced fumbles.
- Team efficiency: Consider third-down conversions, red-zone performance, penalties and time of possession.
These statistics offer a more complete picture than the final score alone.
Final Verdict
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Chicago Bears 20–17 in overtime in their January 18, 2026, NFC Divisional Round game. Kyren Williams’ two rushing touchdowns and Harrison Mevis’ winning field goal were decisive, while Caleb Williams’ three interceptions were costly for Chicago.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Although Chicago gained more total net yards and recorded four sacks, Los Angeles made the most of its scoring opportunities. The matchup demonstrates why turnovers, touchdown production and execution in critical moments can matter more than total yardage.
FAQs:
1. Who won the Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears game?
The Los Angeles Rams won 20–17 against the Chicago Bears in overtime on January 18, 2026, at Soldier Field.
Pro Football Reference
+1
2. How many passing yards did Matthew Stafford record?
Matthew Stafford passed for 258 yards, completing 20 of 42 attempts. He threw no touchdowns and no interceptions.
Pro Football Reference
+1
3. How many passing yards did Caleb Williams have?
Caleb Williams recorded 257 passing yards, completing 23 of 42 attempts. He threw two touchdowns and three interceptions.
Pro Football Reference
+1
4. Who scored the most rushing touchdowns?
Kyren Williams led the game in rushing touchdowns, scoring twice for the Los Angeles Rams. He finished with 87 rushing yards on 21 carries.
Pro Football Reference
+1
5. Which Bears player had the most receiving yards?
Colston Loveland led Chicago’s receivers with 56 yards on four receptions. D.J. Moore finished with 52 receiving yards and one touchdown.
chicagobears.com
+1
6. Which team gained more total yards?
The Chicago Bears gained 417 total net yards, compared with 340 for the Rams. Despite that advantage, Chicago lost because Los Angeles won the scoring battle.
chicagobears.com
+1
7. Who kicked the winning field goal?
Harrison Mevis kicked a 42-yard field goal in overtime to give the Rams a 20–17 victory. The kick came with 3:19 remaining in overtime.
Pro Football Reference
+1
Remember This
- Final score: Rams 20, Bears 17.
- Top Rams rusher: Kyren Williams, 87 yards and two touchdowns.
- Rams quarterback: Matthew Stafford, 258 passing yards.
- Bears quarterback: Caleb Williams, 257 passing yards, two touchdowns and three interceptions.
- Top Bears receiver by yards: Colston Loveland, 56 yards.
- Winning play: Harrison Mevis’ 42-yard overtime field goal.
Conclusion
The Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears match player stats tell the story of a competitive playoff game decided by key moments. The Rams used Kyren Williams’ rushing touchdowns and a late overtime field goal to secure the victory, while Chicago’s offense showed flashes of success through Caleb Williams and D.J. Moore.
For fans analyzing this matchup, the most important lesson is that passing yards, rushing production, defensive turnovers and scoring efficiency all work together to determine the result. Looking at these numbers provides a clearer understanding of how the Rams advanced with a 20–17 win.
David Owen is a passionate writer and communication enthusiast dedicated to helping readers craft charming, witty, and thoughtful replies. Through ReplyCorner, he shares creative response ideas that make conversations engaging and memorable.
